Dangers of Wood Smoke

topic posted Mon, November 12, 2007 - 4:27 AM by  Jon


neighbors have decided to burn wood all day and night...

my breathing is really taking a nosedive....

eyes getting red too...

there used to be a time where you could go to your neighbor - "hey, my kid has bad breathing, would you mind lightening up on the wood smoke?" And the neighbor would apologize to you! saying, "gee, I am so sorry, I hope he is ok. We don't need to use the fireplace, don't worry." Now, in our society that has placed willful ignorance on the mantle, instead of some basic human decency, much less Judeo-Christian values of caring and charity, now it is almost an honored achievement to tell other people to jump in a lake...

here is the letter to the editor of my local paper...

We have all now come to learn of the dangers of second hand smoke. Here is the webpage about it from the American Lung Association:
www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp

There is another kind of "second hand smoke" that enters our lives. It is from other forms of combustion. These include the burning of leaves and wood smoke.

Combustion is combustion. The problems that it produces from cigarettes is not significantly different from that produced by burning wood. If our society has now recognized the health problems of burning cigarettes, it is not too far of a leap to extend the concern to burning wood.

This website illustrates some of the dangers:

burningissues.org/car-www/index.html

I used to love the smell of burning wood. Now, as one of the many victims of asthma in our society, it is no longer a luxury that I can afford.

Asthma affects approxiametly 20 million Americans or about 6.8% of the population. In XXXXX, with a population of about 54,000, that figure works out to be about 3700 people. Though, since XXXXX is in a highly industrialized area, the figures are probably higher.

And here is an article which notes that wood smoke aggravates asthma:
www.thereporter.com/letters/ci_7435068

Quoting from the article, "It is well documented that particulate matter pollution can adversely affect lung function and is a health hazard for those with asthma and lung disease who cannot go outside during the winter when neighbors are burning wood."

In addition to its dangers outright, we already have 70,000 chemicals in our air and water, adding just that extra bit of smoke to already very polluted air. There is quite a bit of belief that rising asthma rates are related to pollution.

The science gets debated for many reasons, some of which have nothing to do with science, but with the agenda of those doing the testing. The chemical industry does not want to be legally responsible for causing asthma and other illnesses in people. They sponsor science to disprove the connections.

Everyone loves the beauty of a fire on a cold winter night. In XXXXX, with at least 3700 people with asthma, in an already polluted environment, this could significantly impact the breathing of people right next door to you.

Whether it is a small child or an elderly person, or just someone with particularly bad asthma whose breathing will be affected, I urge members of the public to consider restricting or eliminating burning wood.

Thank you for your time.

Respectfully,




posted by:
Jon
offline Jon
New Jersey
  • Re: Dangers of Wood Smoke

    Wed, November 14, 2007 - 1:51 PM
    Well, you had better not move to Vermont because many people here burn wood as their primary means of heat. I have asthma and use two different inhalers but I am not bothered by wood smoke as opposed to other kinds of air pollution. I don't know what kind of heat most people in your area use but heating your house is expensive, wood is less expensive in these parts.
    • Re: Dangers of Wood Smoke

      Wed, November 14, 2007 - 2:57 PM
      even if you do not have apparent symptoms from wood smoke, it doesn't mean there isn't an effect and it doesn't mean that it isn't negatively affecting your breathing.

      all particulate increases are bad for asthmatics.

      Even if Vermont burns wood, the total amount of pollution up there is less to the point that the total air quality is still probably much higher than North Jersey....

      We have really abused the natural environment and with glee thrown out all basic common sense. We need to be cautious about all our interactions with the environment.

      It was one thing to burn wood when the US population was what it was in 1850, with that level of industrial development and population size.....we live in a totally different world, yet, amazingly, we think about economic and environmental policy as if we were living in that society and not the present one...

      of the 70,000 chemicals now in our air, water, land (and food), we haven't begun to scratch the surface of any real comprehensive studies into cumulative effects of low level doses over time, much less cumulative effects of multiple chemicals.

      Virtually our entire environmental policy is based on the lunatics notion that the only effect of chemicals is from each one individually, as if, in interaction, there is going to be no further effect. With that thinking, there is no difference in one's breathing wood smoke, versus wood smoke with added cigarette smoke, vs wood smoke with added cigarette smoke and pollution. Even though basic common sense screams that three exposures is certainly going to affect the body and its systems differently than one.

      And the sheer size of the lunacy is that we aren't dealing with the difference between one and three...we are dealing with the multiple interactions of 70,000 (mathematical) vectors. With a complexity that size, we are doing no more than crossing our fingers and hope we don't just drop.

Recent topics in "North Jersey"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Question - Sweat Lodges Jon 0 August 18, 2008
things to do Unsubscribed 1 July 11, 2008
"Where are you from?" Unsubscribed 62 July 8, 2008
Happy Fourth of July! Jon 0 July 4, 2008